This review is based on the 2015 version of the IFRS for SMEs Accounting Standard, which is currently in effect. However, I have also incorporated key insights from the Third edition of the IFRS for SMEs Accounting Standard (issued in February 2025). Although this new edition becomes effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2027, understanding these updates now will help you strategically align your accounting policies for the upcoming transition.

---

The process of implementing and applying International Financial Reporting Standards is dynamic and complex, requiring professionals to possess not only technical knowledge but also a deep understanding of the conceptual difference between various levels of regulation.

The modern international reporting system has a distinct two-tiered structure. The IASB developed the Standard for SMEs as a separate, simplified model to strike a balance between the quality of financial information and the cost of preparing it for companies that are not publicly accountable.

Unlike full IFRS Standards, which are constantly updated, the Standard for SMEs changes much less frequently. This ensures accounting stability but creates a certain “conceptual gap”: the standard for small business still relies on older principles (the 1989 Conceptual Framework), while full IFRS Standards have already moved to new rules.

I have prepared an analytical overview of the IFRS for SMEs Standard and a comparison of its requirements with the provisions of full IFRS Standards. Given the large volume of this material, I have divided it into the following parts:

1. IFRS for SMEs: Foundation and Entry Rules (Sections 1, 2, 35).
2. IFRS for SMEs: Presentation of Financial Statements (Sections 3–10, 31–33).
3. IFRS for SMEs: Accounting for Non-financial Assets (Sections 13–20, 27, 34).
4. IFRS for SMEs: Financial Instruments and Equity (Sections 11–12, 22).
5. IFRS for SMEs: Income, Liabilities, and Taxes (Sections 21, 23–26, 28–30).

---

1. IFRS for SMEs: Foundation and Entry Rules (Sections 1, 2, 35)

IFRS for SMEs is more than just a simplified reporting tool; it is a strategic asset for companies seeking international growth. Recognized by global financial institutions, it delivers the transparency of IFRS while saving up to 40% in accounting resources. In this opening section, we identify which entities qualify for this framework and break down the fundamental conceptual shifts that distinguish it from Full IFRS Standards.

IFRS for SMEs is a standalone standard developed specifically for the needs of entities that do not have public accountability. It offers a significantly simplified alternative to full IFRS Standards while maintaining the international quality of reporting. In this overview, we will examine who is eligible to apply this Standard, the key conceptual differences, and the algorithm for first-time adoption.

Section 1: Who is Eligible to Apply IFRS for SMEs?

Section 1 of IFRS for SMEs acts as a “filter,” defining the scope of entities permitted to apply the simplified reporting regime. Unlike quantitative criteria (turnover, headcount) often used in national legislation, IFRS for SMEs uses the qualitative criterion of “public accountability.”

SME Identification Criteria and Comparison with IAS 1

The central concept of Section 1 is “public accountability.” An entity has no public accountability if:

1. It does not file its financial statements with a securities commission or other regulatory organization for the purpose of issuing any class of instruments in a public market.
2. It does not hold assets in a fiduciary capacity for a broad group of outsiders as one of its primary businesses.

This definition creates a clear boundary: banks, credit unions, insurance companies, and brokers are generally not eligible to use the simplified standard because their activities are, by their nature, publicly significant.

Paragraph 1.3 establishes two imperative criteria for the existence of public accountability, which automatically exclude an entity from the scope of the IFRS for SMEs Standard:

1. Trading instruments in a public market: If the entity’s debt or equity instruments are traded in a public market (a domestic or foreign stock exchange or an over-the-counter market, including local and regional markets) or the entity is in the process of issuing such instruments for trading.
2. Fiduciary capacity: If the entity holds assets in a fiduciary capacity for a broad group of outsiders as one of its primary businesses. This provision targets banks, credit unions, insurance companies, securities brokers/dealers, mutual funds, and investment banks.

Important: Even if you are a Limited Liability Company (LLC/ТОВ), but you hold assets of trusting parties (e.g., a pawnshop or an insurance company), you have public accountability and cannot use this Standard.

Nuances of Interpreting Fiduciary Capacity

The Standard contains an important clarification regarding fiduciary capacity. Many entities may hold client funds (e.g., travel agents, real estate agents, notaries, utility companies receiving advances). However, if this activity is incidental to the primary business, it does not result in public accountability. This distinction is critical as it prevents the unjustified expansion of the circle of “public” entities into the service and retail sectors.

Comparison with Full IFRS Standards

Full IFRS Standards (specifically IAS 1 “Presentation of Financial Statements”) lack a separate section restricting the scope based on accountability. Instead, Full IFRS is designed to meet the needs of investors in public capital markets. In contrast, IFRS for SMEs focuses on external users such as owners who are not involved in managing the business, existing and potential creditors, and credit rating agencies.

Table 1. Comparison of IFRS for SMEs (Section 1) vs. Full IFRS

Comparison Parameter	IFRS for SMEs (Section 1)	Full IFRS Standards (IAS/IFRS)
Access Principle	Restrictive: Prohibited for financial institutions and listed companies.	Universal: Open to any organization, regardless of size or status.
Definition of SME	Qualitative (lack of public accountability). Quantitative criteria (asset size, revenue) are absent.	Absent. “Small and Medium-sized Entities” are not distinguished as a separate regulatory category.
Public Markets	Listing Prohibition (including regional exchanges).	The primary target scope of application.
Fiduciary Responsibility	Holding assets for outsiders as a primary business excludes SME status.	Regulated by specific standards (IFRS 17, IFRS 9) without restricting status.
Subsidiaries	A subsidiary of a listed group may use IFRS for SMEs if it has no public accountability itself (Para 1.6).	Typically use Full IFRS to facilitate consolidation, although this is not a requirement of the standard itself.
Attention: New IFRS 19 “Subsidiaries without Public Accountability: Disclosures”. This standard solves the double accounting problem for groups. It allows subsidiaries (that do not have public accountability) to apply the recognition and measurement requirements of Full IFRS Standards but with reduced disclosure requirements. This is an ideal solution for simplifying consolidation without overburdening the subsidiary’s reporting.

The “Size vs. Substance” Paradox – Global Concepts and Local Realities

Analysis of Section 1 reveals a fascinating conceptual paradox within the global standard.

The Global Framework: The IFRS for SMEs Accounting Standard is defined not by turnover or headcount, but by public accountability. This creates a unique landscape: a multi-billion dollar private agro-industrial group, financed through private equity or bank loans, qualifies as an “SME” under Section 1 because it has no public debt or equity instruments. Conversely, a small regional bank, despite having minimal assets, is mandated to apply Full IFRS Standards due to its fiduciary responsibility (managing third-party funds).

The Ukrainian Context: In Ukraine, this global flexibility is significantly narrowed by national legislation. While the IFRS for SMEs framework would theoretically allow large private groups to use simplified reporting, the Ukrainian Law on Accounting overrides this. If a private group meets the criteria of a “large enterprise” (based on assets, revenue, and headcount), it is legally required to apply Full IFRS Standards, regardless of its private status.

For an international user of financial statements, the “IFRS for SMEs” label in Ukraine signals a specific risk and responsibility profile: it serves as a marker that the entity has not yet crossed the “large business” threshold or falls outside the legislative scope of Public Interest Entities (PIEs).

Section 2: Concepts and Pervasive Principles – The Fundamental Basis

Section 2 defines the “spirit” of the Standard, establishing the objective of financial statements and the qualitative characteristics of information. Although it is based on the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting, there are significant divergences between the version for SMEs and the updated 2018 Conceptual Framework used for Full IFRS Standards.

Objective and Qualitative Characteristics: SME vs. Full IFRS

The objective of financial statements of an SME is to provide information about the financial position, performance, and cash flows of the entity that is useful to a wide range of users in making economic decisions. In Full IFRS Standards, the emphasis is placed on helping existing and potential investors, lenders, and other creditors in making decisions about providing resources to the entity.

Qualitative characteristics in Section 2 of the IFRS for SMEs Standard are presented as a single list of 10 items, including understandability, relevance, materiality, and reliability. The 2018 Conceptual Framework introduced a hierarchy: fundamental qualitative characteristics (relevance and faithful representation) and enhancing qualitative characteristics (comparability, verifiability, timeliness, and understandability).

Table 2: Comparison of Qualitative Characteristics

Characteristic	IFRS for SMEs (Section 2)	Conceptual Framework (2018)
Reliability / Faithful Representation	Uses the term “Reliability”, which includes freedom from material error and bias.	Uses the term “Faithful Representation”; the concept of reliability has been removed as a separate term.
Substance Over Form	Highlighted as a separate principle to enhance reliability.	Considered an integral part of faithful representation, not a separate item.
Prudence	Clearly defined as the inclusion of a degree of caution in the exercise of judgments needed in making estimates (so as not to overstate assets/income).	Reconfirmed in 2018 as an aspect of neutrality (caution without asymmetry) supporting faithful representation.
Cost Constraint	Contains the specific concept of “undue cost or effort”.	Cost is viewed as a pervasive constraint on the information that can be provided by financial reporting.

Elements of Financial Statements and Recognition Criteria

The definitions of assets and liabilities in Section 2 of the IFRS for SMEs Standard remain conservative. The Full 2018 Conceptual Framework changed these definitions.

Assets

• IFRS for SMEs (Para 2.15a): “A resource controlled by the entity as a result of past events and from which future economic benefits are expected to flow to the entity.” The emphasis is on the probability of the flow of benefits.
• Full IFRS (2018): “A present economic resource controlled by the entity as a result of past events.” An economic resource is a “right that has the potential to produce economic benefits.”

The requirement regarding the “expectation” (probability) of the flow of benefits has been removed from the definition.

Implication: Under Full IFRS Standards, an asset can be identified even if the probability of obtaining a benefit is low (but a right exists), whereas under IFRS for SMEs, such an item might not meet the recognition criteria.

Liabilities

• IFRS for SMEs (Para 2.15b): “A present obligation… the settlement of which is expected to result in an outflow…”
• Full IFRS (2018): “A present obligation of the entity to transfer an economic resource as a result of past events.” The key innovation is the criterion of “no practical ability to avoid” the transfer of the resource.

Implication: The new definition in Full IFRS covers a broader range of situations where a legal requirement may be absent, but economic compulsion or established practice makes avoidance impossible (constructive obligations). IFRS for SMEs remains more tied to clear “outflows.”

Mathematically, the accounting equation in both systems remains unchanged.

However, the recognition of income and expenses directly results from the recognition of changes in assets and liabilities. The IFRS for SMEs Standard prohibits the recognition of items that do not meet the definition of assets or liabilities, even if done for the purpose of “smoothing” profit under the matching concept.

IFRS for SMEs establishes two rigid recognition criteria (Para 2.27):

1. Probability of inflow/outflow of economic benefits;
2. Availability of a cost or value that can be measured reliably.

Full IFRS Standards (2018) have moved away from rigid “probability” thresholds, replacing them with the concept of whether recognition provides relevant information and a faithful representation of the asset or liability. This allows for the recognition of complex derivatives with high volatility, which in IFRS for SMEs often remain off-balance sheet or are measured using simplified methods.

The Concept of “Undue Cost or Effort”: A Unique Tool for SMEs

Paragraphs 2.14A–2.14D introduce a mechanism absent in the full scope of Full IFRS Standards. This exemption allows an SME not to comply with a specific requirement of the Standard (e.g., fair value measurement) if the incremental cost or effort of obtaining such information significantly exceeds the benefits to users. This decision requires professional judgment by management and mandatory disclosure of the reasoning. In Full IFRS Standards (e.g., IFRS 13), fair value measurement is mandatory if an asset is subject to such measurement, regardless of cost (with rare exceptions for “impracticability”).

Warning: Applying this exemption is not a “carte blanche.” Auditors require a detailed documented calculation of why exactly the costs are undue. A simple lack of funds or staff is not a valid argument.

While the Conceptual Framework of Full IFRS Standards mentions the cost constraint (cost-benefit analysis), it serves as a guideline for the standard setter (IASB). In contrast, the concept of “undue cost or effort” in IFRS for SMEs is a working tool specifically for the preparer of financial statements, allowing for legitimate deviations from certain requirements at the entity level.

Section 35: Transition to the IFRS for SMEs – A Roadmap for the Accountant

Section 35 is critical for Ukrainian entities planning to transition from National GAAP (П(С)БО) to the IFRS for SMEs Standard. Its structure is analogous to IFRS 1 “First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards”, but it contains significant simplifications.

Transition Procedure and Date of Transition

The date of transition to the IFRS for SMEs Standard is the start of the first period for which the entity presents full comparative information. For reporting for the year 2025, this date will be January 1, 2024.

The entity must prepare an opening statement of financial position at the date of transition by performing the following actions:

1. Recognition: Include all assets and liabilities required by the IFRS for SMEs Standard.
2. Derecognition: Remove items that do not meet the recognition criteria of the Standard.
3. Reclassification: Change categories of items (e.g., reclassifying financial leases from off-balance sheet accounts).
4. Measurement: Apply the measurement methods of the IFRS for SMEs Standard to all items.

All adjustments are recognized directly in retained earnings at the date of transition (Para 35.8).

Key Difference from IFRS 1: The IFRS for SMEs Standard (Section 35) does not require the mandatory presentation of the opening statement of financial position at the date of transition as part of the first financial statements. Full IFRS Standards (IAS 1, IFRS 1) require the presentation of at least three statements of financial position (current, comparative, opening), ensuring full transparency of the “entry point.” For SMEs, this requirement is waived to reduce the reporting burden, although the opening statement of financial position itself must be prepared for internal calculations (Disclosure under Para 35.12).

Comparative Analysis of Exemptions: Section 35 vs. IFRS 1

Section 35 offers a list of mandatory exceptions and voluntary exemptions that differ slightly from IFRS 1.

Topic	IFRS for SMEs (Section 35)	IFRS 1 (Full Version)
Mandatory Exceptions	Derecognition of financial assets, hedge accounting, accounting estimates, discontinued operations, NCI, government loans.	Similar list, but more detailed regarding embedded derivatives and insurance contracts.
Voluntary Exemptions	12 main items (Paras 35.10(a)–(l)).	Over 20 specific exemptions (Appendices C–E).
Equity Reconciliation	At two dates: date of transition and end of the latest annual period.	Similar requirement.
Profit Reconciliation	Reconciliation of profit or loss for the latest period.	Reconciliation of total comprehensive income.

Top Voluntary Exemptions

For CFOs, the most attractive are the voluntary exemptions that allow for significantly reducing the burden during transition:

1. Fair value as deemed cost (Para 35.10©): An entity may measure items of property, plant and equipment or investment property at fair value at the date of transition and use that amount as deemed cost going forward. This allows “cleaning” the balance sheet of outdated National GAAP valuations.
2. Business combinations (Para 35.10(a)): An entity is permitted not to restate business combinations that occurred before the date of transition. This saves resources on reconstructing complex goodwill calculations.
3. Cumulative translation differences (Para 35.10(d)): Cumulative translation differences for foreign operations may be deemed to be zero at the date of transition (“fresh start”).
4. Separate financial statements (Para 35.10(j)): Investments in subsidiaries may be measured at cost or at fair value (as deemed cost) at the date of transition.
5. Compound financial instruments (Para 35.10(e)): An entity need not separate the instrument into equity and liability components if the liability component is no longer outstanding at the date of transition.
6. Deferred income tax (Para 35.10(h)): An entity is permitted to apply Section 29 “Income Tax” prospectively from the date of transition. This is a significant simplification compared to the full version of IAS 12 (which generally requires retrospective application).

Key Differences in Requirements, Methods, and Concepts

A comparison of the IFRS for SMEs Standard with Full IFRS Standards reveals a number of strategic divergences that affect financial metrics and accounting complexity.

Measurement Methods and Subsequent Accounting

In Full IFRS Standards, there is a trend toward broader use of Fair Value. In IFRS for SMEs, priority is given to Historical Cost.

• Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE): IFRS for SMEs permits the Revaluation Model (since the 2015 amendments), but most SMEs choose the Cost Model. Unlike Full IFRS (IAS 16), SMEs review useful life and residual value only if there are indicators of a significant change, rather than annually.
• Borrowing Costs: Under Full IFRS (IAS 23), they must be capitalized for qualifying assets. Under IFRS for SMEs, borrowing costs are always recognized as an expense of the period – capitalization is prohibited.
• Intangible Assets (R&D): Historically, IFRS for SMEs prohibited the capitalization of development costs. Important: During the preparation of the Third Edition (2025), the IASB considered allowing capitalization (as in IAS 38) but rejected this proposal. Therefore, all development costs continue to be recognized exclusively as expenses of the period.
• Amortization of Intangibles: Under Full IFRS (IAS 38), there are intangible assets with an indefinite useful life (they are not amortized). In contrast, IFRS for SMEs requires amortization of all intangible assets (they are considered to have a finite useful life). If the useful life cannot be estimated reliably, it is determined based on management’s best estimate but shall not exceed 10 years (rule effective since 2015).

Financial Instruments

This is the area of most radical simplification. Instead of the complex IFRS 9 models, IFRS for SMEs divides instruments into “Basic” (Section 11) and “Other” (Section 12).

• Basic financial instruments are measured at amortized cost.
• Complex instruments are measured at fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL).
• SMEs may choose to apply the recognition and measurement requirements of IAS 39 (or IFRS 9 in the future edition) instead of Sections 11 and 12, but with disclosures required by IFRS for SMEs.

Leases and Impairment

While Full IFRS Standards have moved to the IFRS 16 model (single lessee accounting model), IFRS for SMEs (Section 20) still retains the distinction between operating and finance leases for lessees. This keeps the SME balance sheet significantly simpler, as operating leases do not result in the recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities.

Regarding impairment, IFRS for SMEs uses a simplified model for estimating the recoverable amount. While under Full IFRS (IAS 36) goodwill impairment testing is mandatory annually, for SMEs it is performed only if there are indicators of impairment.

Regulatory Framework in Ukraine: The Role of the Ministry of Finance and the Use of Interpretations

The Ministry of Finance of Ukraine serves as the primary authority for the official endorsement and publication of IFRS within the national jurisdiction. This mandate includes the adoption of the Standards themselves, as well as the accompanying IFRIC and SIC Interpretations.

Hierarchy of Guidance for SMEs: It is essential to recognize that the IFRS for SMEs Accounting Standard is a standalone framework. According to Section 10 (Accounting Policies, Estimates and Errors), if a specific issue is not covered by the Standard, management must first look to the concepts and principles outlined in Section 2. Unlike Full IFRS, direct reference to IFRIC/SIC Interpretations is voluntary, not mandatory.

Practical Application of Interpretations: While not legally binding for SMEs, the interpretations published by the Ministry of Finance provide vital benchmarks for complex accounting treatments. For instance:

• IFRIC 22 (Foreign Currency Transactions and Advance Consideration)
• IFRIC 23 (Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatments)

These documents help CFOs deepen their understanding of mechanisms that may have been simplified in the SME Standard, offering a reliable basis for developing robust accounting policies in challenging scenarios.

Official Endorsement and Translation Nuances

It is important for my international readers to note that while Ukraine has officially adopted IFRS, the local application is governed by the official translations issued by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine.

Key Considerations:

• Translation Lag: There is often a temporal gap between the IASB issuing an update in London and its official endorsement by Ukrainian authorities.
• Regulatory Compliance: For statutory reporting and local tax purposes, companies in Ukraine must strictly follow the officially published Ukrainian text.

Strategic Recommendations for Financial Professionals

For CFOs and senior finance executives, transitioning to the IFRS for SMEs Accounting Standard should be a deliberate strategic move rather than a mere compliance exercise. Based on my practice, I recommend focusing on the following key areas:

1. Status Validation: Before proceeding, strictly document the absence of public accountability. Even a small entity loses its eligibility for this framework if it has issued publicly traded bonds or equity.
2. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Simplifications: Evaluate how specific sections will impact your financial position. For companies with extensive operating leases or high R&D costs, the shift from Full IFRS to the SME Standard can significantly alter the structure of the Balance Sheet and P&L.
3. Quality over Quantity in Disclosures: While the disclosure requirements are reduced by approximately 90%, the quality of the remaining information is paramount. I particularly advise providing robust justifications when applying the “undue cost or effort” exemption to ensure transparency for auditors and lenders.
4. Systemic Transition (Section 35): Use the transition date to optimize your asset valuation. Utilizing fair value as deemed cost for property, plant, and equipment (PPE) is a powerful tool to “reset” your accounting records, eliminating legacy valuation discrepancies and providing a clean slate for future reporting.

The IFRS for SMEs Accounting Standard is not merely a “lite” version of accounting rules; it is a sophisticated instrument designed to provide global transparency at a reasonable cost. In the context of the Ukrainian market, adopting this framework is a vital step toward integrating local businesses into the global economy, offering international partners and creditors a language they trust and understand.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)